In an epoch which should be called The Disinformation Age, alternative and social media pay increasingly more attention to seemingly ‘radical intellectuals’, each of whom is proclaiming that the only viable means of preventing the Zionist genocide of all indigenous European peoples is by uniting under the political banner of the ‘White Nationalist’, to violently overthrow our oppressors and send all foreign ‘invaders’ back from whence the came, dead or alive.
Since violence is the initiation and exertion of aggressive physical force against another’s body or property, no moral justification is offered in support of this amoral rhetoric. Instead, the passionate advocates who deliver it like per-emptory machine gun fire usually rely upon the logical fallacy that, because the history of Mankind is seeped in the blood of wars which were largely fought to establish and protect national boundaries, a nationalist revolutionary war is the only realistic solution to the problems with which we are currently faced.
As all dispassionate students of the rise of Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin and Mao inevitably glean from their studies, the provocative rhetoric they dictated at both public and private meetings resulted in their followers committing heinous, barbaric and merciless acts in the name of nationalist or communist revolutionary causes.
20th Century Murders by Authoritarian and Totalitarian Governments
This simply reprehensible position is compounded by the demonstrable fact that hundreds of millions of people have been slaughtered during Rothschild-manufactured political revolutions and military conflicts over the past one hundred years, which every one of the ‘radical intellectuals’ espousing the purportedly noble virtues of the authoritarian nationalist state has no excuse for not knowing. Especially when, as in the case of Kai Murros, the individual calling for “National Revolution in England” is not even indigenous to these shores. However, neither the Home Office, nor the Rothschild-controlled Secret Intelligence Services [SIS], appear have have any problem with Murros inciting violence on the streets of Britain and spreading his message at Oxford University and on social media.
The primary reason I find these developments particularly perturbing is because I have been warning those who are paying attention for the past two years that there is an abundance of circumstantial evidence which suggests that race war is being fomented on these shores and in the rest of what is rather insultingly referred to by globalists as “Old Europe”; the primary catalyst for which is the forced mass migration of ‘refugees’ into all European Union member states, which we have been witnessing in much larger numbers since the initiation of the illegal war of aggression against the Syrian people by the US-NATO alliance and their manufactured boogieman, ISIS.
Whilst eye witnesses have reported that there are many thousands of genuine refugees stranded in concentration camps in the countries bordering Syria, desperate to return home to rebuild their partially devastated country, the vast majority of those who have made their way to the nations of Europe are economic migrants from Africa, the Middle East and Pakistan, almost all of whom are healthy-looking men between sixteen and forty, who have been aggressively demanding the benefit privileges of the corporatist state wherever they have landed, more often than not in the absence of the means to verify their ubiquitous claims that they are fleeing the on-going war in Syria, without which they would not be able to justify their applications for asylum.
To make matters considerably worse, each new wave of migrants into Europe has brought with it the kind of sexual violence that has only ever been previously witnessed by Europeans in the aftermath of military conflict, when the prerequisite moral degradation of war has so often resulted in the mass raping of women by the ‘victors’, as happened in Germany at the end of the second great slaughter of the last century, more commonly referred to as World War II.
Horrifyingly, eye witnesses and traumatised victims have reported that, at the turn of midnight on the eve of 2016, large groups of Arabs and North Africans, numbering up to around one thousand, committed mass sexual assaults and rapes in Cologne, Hamburg and other German cities, resulting in angry demonstrations by indigenous Germans against what is perceived by many Europeans to be a Muslim invasion.
The escalation of opposition to the EU and its blatantly genocidal policies is growing exponentially in all of its so-called member states; so much so that there is already chatter among the political classes that the Schengen Agreement might be on the brink of being formally suspended, which would unequivocally result in the end of the Open Borders Policy, the deportation of all economic migrants and the total collapse of the Euro-Zone and its valueless currency.
All in all, there is no doubt that the indigenous peoples of Europe face the most dangerous crises of the last seventy years. Now is not the time to be seduced by the tried and tested machinations of the agents of Rothschild-controlled violent revolution.
A Deeply Flawed, Yet Seductive, Ideology
Despite the incontrovertible fact that none of these grave crises would have arisen were it not for the actions of the officers of collectivist governments, Nationalists often say is that it is a perfectly natural state of affairs for the masses to be led by a centralised government of the so-called ‘elite’ of their race, since the vast majority of people will always be followers who require leaders to make their decisions for them.
This position is akin to arguing that a room full of men with broken legs will always require crutches to support their weight, without taking into account the fact that those crutches will become redundant as soon as the limbs have had sufficient time to recover their natural functions; just as all men have the capacity to live freely in peaceful voluntary association and to think for themselves, even when they exist in a state of mental, physical and emotional bondage under a dictatorship of the collective.
In other words, it is illogical to conclude that most people are followers just because most people currently roaming the Earth have deferred responsibility for their own lives to various figures or institutions representing purported collectivist authority; on the basis that the vast majority have been groomed from birth to do so and remain oblivious to the consequences of such insidious statist programming.
How different the world would be if we all accepted that collectivist government is necessarily tyrannical in nature, irrespective of political ethos.
Nevertheless, all of the evidence I have seen has brought me to the seemingly unavoidable conclusion that a meticulous plan to destroy the true diversity of Mankind has been underway for almost a century, largely via socially engineered miscegenation, which is defined as the interbreeding of different races, or of persons of different racial backgrounds.
If this phenomenon continues at the rate it is currently in Europe, White people will be the minorities in their own lands within a single generation. This has already occurred in many ancient capital cities, where indigenous European children are often outnumbered by children with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds.
However, what is never considered by White Nationalists is that the genocide they oppose cannot be achieved without having the identical effect upon the darker skinned peoples who migrate to European nations and interbreed with White people. In much the same way that a jug of water cannot be retrieved once it has been poured into a lake, neither the White nor the Black race would be sustained if the last white woman mates with the last black man.
To call this a genocide against White people exclusively is to ignore the self-evident fact that it is also a genocide against Black and Brown people, none of whom would survive in the event that the Zionist’s perpetual strategy of divide and conquer prevails in Europe.
‘The Jewish Question’
Those very same White Nationalists often claim this desperately dangerous situation is the result of allowing “The Jews” to take over control of money, information and government, when it is clear to all who research the subject without prejudice that such control has been held for the last two centuries by the House of Rothschild, the high commissioners of International Communism, National Socialism, Neo-Corporatism and Political Zionism.
The Rothschilds’ religious heritage and the placement of Zionist Jews in powerful positions does nothing to justify the allegation that an entire race of people are culpable for the formers’ crimes.
Furthermore, to willfully ignore the blatant differences between people who consider themselves to be ‘Jewish’, by tarring them all with the Zionist brush, is no different from condemning everybody who considers themselves a Catholic for all the crimes of the Roman Church.
Having spent ten years of my life living and working with individuals who most people would consider to be ‘Jewish’, thereby witnessing their sensibilities for myself, I have identified four very different archetypes:
A: People who identify themselves as Jews because they believe and follow the Torah/Talmud [Religious Jews].
B: People who identify themselves as Jews due to ancestry and family lineage [Cultural Jews].
C: People who identify themselves as Jews for purely political reasons [Political or Zionist Jews].
D: People who become estranged from their inherited religion, culture and political ideology [Estranged Jews].
For almost a year, I lived with a Cultural Jew, who was one of the most generous and kind-hearted men I have ever known. He was openly critical of his inherited religion and culture, whilst he rejected entirely the Zionist concept of Jewish Superiority, despite his fascination with Jewish history and the mysteries of the Kabbalah. He also insisted that every Jewish man will be petrified of his mother for pretty much his entire life and will therefore almost always do that which meets with her approval, as a direct result of her decision to allow his genitalia to be mutilated without anesthetic, a few days after his birth.
Previous to that, I cohabited for four years with an equally generous and kind-hearted woman, who considered herself a Cultural Jew, even though her mother isn’t Jewish and despite the fact that her father is an Estranged Jew, who rejected the imposition of religious, cultural and political ideologies long before meeting her mother; whilst retaining an intelligently critical view on the foolishness, arrogance and cruelty of certain Jewish customs, most notably circumcision, since neither of his two sons had their genitals mutilated as infants.
As long as I live, I will never forget the day he painfully revealed to me how deeply troubled he was by his apparent ‘Jewishness’, which almost all those outside of his family presumed was an inevitability of his birth. He is one of the least religiously, culturally and politically ‘Jewish’ men I have ever met, as well as one of the most intelligent, creative and compassionate.
Given the foregoing, it is perfectly understandable that every time I encounter a claim that “The Jews” are responsible for all the problems in the world, my instinct tells me that the judgment of whomsoever is making such an allegation is not to be trusted, for one or more of the following reasons.
- They are not aware of the facts and have merely adopted somebody else’s position;
- They are willfully ignoring the truth in order to retain their skewed world view; or
- They are acting as an agent provocateur, charged with the task of fomenting hatred of all types of ‘Jewishness’.
As always, one must ask: who benefits from this set of circumstances?
Certainly not Religious Jews, who regularly organise mass protests against the occupation of Palestine and the creation of the state of Israel, in open opposition to Zionism, which they vociferously blame for virtually all the problems in the world. The Cultural Jews don’t benefit either because they are almost always more like Gentiles than Jews in the way they view life, the universe and everything, since they largely live and work amongst them in relative harmony, merely paying lip-service to their religious and cultural heritage. Estranged Jews, however, get the worst deal of all, since they are vilified for allegedly embodying that which they have effectively rejected.
Furthermore, as Religious, Cultural and Estranged Jews are all mistaken as part of ‘The Jewish Problem’, which both White Nationalists and Political Zionists are equally obsessed with for seemingly polarised reasons; their unjust disadvantage in such a climate of prejudice towards all forms of Jewishness is obvious, on the basis that their very existence in European societies is considered a hindrance to the progress of the agendas of both White Nationalism and Zionist Supremacy.
Therefore, only Political Jews or Zionists would actually gain tangible benefits from the success of the White Nationalist propagandists in fomenting violent revolution, since bloody race wars on the streets of Britain and mainland Europe would almost certainly provide the convenient pretext for the brutal eradication of all opposition to the agenda of the House of Rothschild, which long since commissioned the implementation of the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan by the unaccountable, unelected EU Commissars, who are ruthlessly dictating economic, social and cultural policies specifically designed to maximise the miscegenation of all indigenous races of people [bar those considered to be the right kind of ‘Jewish’].
In his 1920’s book, Praktischer Idealismus, Coudenhove-Kalergi [pictured above] made the following prediction for the future of Mankind and the role of Political Jews as a new breed of aristocrat:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution].”
For and on behalf of the new European nobility, Coudenhove-Kalergi declared the abolition of the right of self-determination and suggested that the elimination of diversity would be achieved through the contrived clash of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. How chillingly ironic that these objectives have largely been achieved by governments enforcing policies which purport to be for the purposes of bringing about ‘ethnic diversity’, rather than the elimination of it.
It would be churlish to suggest that White Nationalism is not an ethnic separatist movement, since its principle aim is to separate White European peoples from all other races and cultures; whilst the issue of forced mass migration is what underpins the rhetoric of its proponents and is an obvious consequence of the deliberately reckless immigration and border policies of just about every major political party in Europe.
In order for the indigenous Europeans to be controlled by the Zionist elite, Coudenhove-Kalergi stated that it is imperative that diverse nations of peoples are genetically diluted into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians, who no longer resemble their ancestors or have any knowledge of their ancient heritage, which so many brave men and women gave their lives to preserve for their descendants.
It is also seethingly ironic that prominent White Nationalists regularly cite the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan as evidence that genocide is being waged by western governments against White Europeans, which, of course, it most certainly is. However, what is never mentioned by these individuals is that he plainly stated that the plan is to interbreed Blacks, Whites and Asians out of existence. At no point did he state that such genocide was only intended to eradicate nations of White people exclusively.
It is therefore dishonest for any researcher or commentator or intellectual to imply that the planned genocides are exclusive to White people by perpetrating the #WhiteGenocide meme on social media platforms; just as it is when Black Nationalists proclaim that oppression, persecution and prejudice are only suffered by those who are not White.
Both separatist positions lead to one inevitable outcome – the division and conquest of perpetually oppressed peoples of all races, by the architects of Political Zionism, whom Coudenhove-Kalergi described as “… the spiritual nobility of Europe.”
It is inescapable that he was referring to the House of Rothschild and its octopus-like network of moneyed, Zionist aristocrats, which effectively took control of world trade, credit and debt in the aftermath of Wellington’s victory at the Battle of Waterloo, after financing Napoleon through its Paris lending house and Wellington through its London operation; having bought every major international company trading in the summer of 1815 at fire-sale prices, following the London stock market crash which was famously caused by Nathan Rothschild, when he openly started frantically selling government bonds before the news of Wellington’s victory had reached the English establishment, thereby causing a panic which triggered the greatest transfer of wealth in known history to one family.
The certain result of financing both sides of the war was that the Crown of England and Napoleonic France were left with gold debts to the Rothschilds that they had no hope of settling; whilst the majority of the European aristocracy’s trade interests were under the control of the same family of committed Political Jews, who were so famously enamored by the titles of nobility which were bestowed upon them by their royal debtors in lieu of payment, along with the unrestricted right to issue and trade in government bonds.
There is absolutely no evidence that the wealth and power the Rothschilds had accumulated by the summer of 1815 has ever depreciated. In actual fact, all the evidence suggests that both have grown exponentially over the past two centuries.
I have therefore been forced to conclude that Black, White and Brown Nationalism represent the antithesis of Political Zionism [the thesis of this particular Hegelian Dialectic]; the intended synthesis of which is the annihilation of the true, natural diversity of Mankind, by and through miscegenation, race wars, Cultural Marxism and forced migration, catalysed by a succession of aggressive wars by White nation states against innocent Black and Brown peoples and the adoption of Zionist policies by their Rothschild-controlled puppet governments.
In reality, there is only one form of Nationalism that serves all nations of free indigenous peoples: Anarcho-Nationalism, which is entirely predicated on the voluntary association of self-governed, autonomous peoples, for the purposes of securing the mutual benefit and protection of every individual within an Anarcho-Nation, in the absence of the most prolific murderer the world has ever known – collectivist government – to which all other forms of Nationalism would subject us all, whether we consent to its dictates or not.