Brexit Shambles: Britain Left The EU On March 29 2019
Here lies what might turn out to be the real reason for the Brexit shambles presided over by Cameron and May, who’ve teed everything up perfectly for Boris Johnson to play the role of the English Trump and finish the job of turning this already deeply troubled and divided country into a Total Surveillance 5G Smart-State.
The European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 clearly states that:
1. The Prime Minister may notify, under Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the EU.
2. This section has effect despite any provision made by or under the European Communities Act 1972 or any other enactment.
Whilst Article 50 prescribes that:
1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.
2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention.
3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.
Once notice of withdrawal was given by the UK government on March the 28th 2017, that the UK was leaving the EU, in the absence of a deal, Exit Day automatically fell on the 29th of March 2019, by operation of the 2017 Act and Article 50.
No Statutory Authority To Postpone Exit Day
Since there are no other provisions in the 2017 Act, there was no statutory authority for the UK government and the EU to postpone Exit Day under section 3 of Article 50, which means the UK left the EU on the 29th of March, irrespective of the controlled media circus pretending otherwise.
Furthermore, because the 2017 Act prescribes that it has legal effect which supersedes the 1972 Act and all other subsequent enactments, it implicitly repealed all EU-related legislation on March the 29th, without giving Parliament a get-out clause.
That being the case, the treasonous European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, which seeks to replace UK law with EU law on an entirely fictitious future Exit Day, is null and void at law.
However, this would explain the series of tiresome political fiascoes which have made most people in this country wish the referendum never happened, regardless of which way they voted.
It would also explain the many attempts by Parliament to draft a bill which postpones Exit Day, on the basis that the 2017 Act has created a legal impasse, which the government has no lawful means of averting.
Conspiracy To Mislead The British People
In the event all of the above is accepted as established fact, it would be clear that Parliament and the EU have conspired, with the assistance of the media, to mislead the British people into believing that Exit Day didn’t happen on the 29th of March.
Their motivation for doing so is to make sure that UK law is repealed and replaced with EU law, on whichever day they falsely claim to be Exit Day.
Whichever way you stand on the Brexit issue, one thing is certain: nobody voted to leave whilst retaining EU law and nobody voted to remain under EU law without EU membership.
Moreover, on the basis that section 2 of the 2017 Act prescribes that it has effect despite the provisions of the 1972 Act or any other enactment, the 2018 Act is incapable of taking legal effect, since it seeks to go around the binding notice of withdrawal.
In other words, the UK government did not have the legal right to agree to an extension to the period of the notice of withdrawal, under section 3 of Article 50.
Brexit High Court Case
Nevertheless, when an application to proceed with a claim of Judicial Review was recently made by solicitor, Robin Tillbrook, seeking a declaration that Britain left the EU on March the 29th, it was dismissed by a High Court judge as [yes, you guessed it] “totally without merit”.
Those of you who have seen The Great British Mortgage Swindle will already know that dismissing claims as TWM is the means by which the judiciary shuts down any case which comprises a threat to the establishment’s private vested interests.
In this instance, the vested interest in question is enforcing the terms of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, in order to establish the supremacy of EU law over UK law:
2 Saving for EU-derived domestic legislation
(1) EU-derived domestic legislation, as it has effect in domestic law immediately before exit day, continues to have effect in domestic law on and after exit day.
3 Incorporation of direct EU legislation
(1) Direct EU legislation, so far as operative immediately before exit day, forms part of domestic law on and after exit day.
5 Exceptions to savings and incorporation
(1) The principle of the supremacy of EU law does not apply to any enactment or rule of law passed or made on or after exit day.
(2) Accordingly, the principle of the supremacy of EU law continues to apply on or after exit day so far as relevant to the interpretation, disapplication or quashing of any enactment or rule of law passed or made before exit day.
(3 ) Subsection (1) does not prevent the principle of the supremacy of EU law from applying to a modification made on or after exit day of any enactment or rule of law passed or made before exit day if the application of the principle is consistent with the intention of the modification.
(4 ) The Charter of Fundamental Rights is not part of domestic law on or after exit day.
This Act is therefore a shameful attempt to establish the superiority of the EU’s Napoleonic Code under statute. It also represents the denouement of the long-stated aim of Theresa May to get rid of UK Human Rights law.
A Very British Coup
Given the probability of Boris Johnson becoming the next unelected Prime Minister very soon, the fact that he has now hung his hat on a ‘No Deal Brexit’ this October, under WTO rules and tariffs, is merely an elaborate political charade.
The reality of the situation is that Britain left the EU on March the 29th by operation of the 2017 Act, as every MP who passed it into law it has no excuse for not knowing.
This necessarily means that they are all complicit in a treasonous and dishonest attempt to replace domestic law with EU law and without retaining any of the benefits of EU membership.
Indubitably, those who wanted to stay in the EU won’t get what they voted for and neither will those who voted to leave.
However, those who wanted to retain the unaccountable power authorized by EU legislation, will succeed in a very British coup, if the provisions of the 2017 Act are not upheld.